>

>

Build vs Buy: A Critical Consideration for TPAs

Build vs Buy: A Critical Consideration for TPAs

This article explores the advantages and disadvantages of building versus buying technology solutions for Third-Party Administrators (TPAs) in retirement plan administration.

David Chen

In the ever-evolving landscape of retirement plan administration, Third-Party Administrators (TPAs) face a pivotal choice: should they build in-house technology solutions or purchase off-the-shelf customer experience (CX) and automation platforms? This dilemma is not just a matter of preference; it can significantly impact operational efficiency, financial sustainability, and security posture.

Financial Comparison: The True Cost of Solutions

When it comes to financial implications, a detailed analysis reveals stark contrasts between building and buying. According to a 2022 Gartner IT Survey, organizations that opted for purchased solutions experienced implementation times that were 30% faster than those that developed systems in-house. On closer inspection, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) paints a compelling picture. Building a proprietary system can incur costs exceeding $500,000 over three years in development and maintenance. In contrast, purchasing an established platform typically costs around $150,000 annually, inclusive of support and updates. For TPAs aiming to maximize their budget, this cost differential can be significant.

Operational Efficiency: Implementation Speed and Support Structures

The speed at which TPAs can adapt their technology to meet client demands and regulatory changes is paramount in this sector, characterized by rapid evolution. As highlighted in the Gartner report, purchasing a flexible solution allows organizations to transition quickly and effectively without dealing with the extensive resource allocation that in-house developments require. One TPA executive articulated, "The risk and resource allocation in building your own system can be overwhelming; vendor solutions often come with established security protocols."

These vendor solutions are designed to provide robust support structures, ensuring that TPAs can dedicate their internal resources primarily towards client service, rather than the complexities of tech maintenance. This shift in focus can enable TPAs to cultivate deeper relationships with their clients and deliver a superior service experience.

Security Insights: A Crucial Consideration

In today's digital landscape, security remains a top priority. The 2023 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report indicates that the average cost for managing a data breach hovers around $4.35 million. Given this staggering figure, the security frameworks provided by established vendors become a strategic advantage. Organizations that build their systems must contend with the responsibility of developing and maintaining security measures, which can divert focus from their core activities. Therefore, when weighing the build vs. buy options, the risks associated with cybersecurity should not be underestimated.

Conclusion: Recommendations for TPAs

In light of these considerations, TPAs are encouraged to conduct a thorough analysis of their needs, capabilities, and long-term objectives when deciding on technology investments. While the allure of tailor-made systems may be strong, the case for purchasing proven solutions often speaks to both financial prudence and strategic agility.

Investing in proven technology allows organizations to allocate talent more effectively towards client services instead of system maintenance, as noted by an industry expert who stated, "Investing in proven technology allows us to allocate our talent more effectively towards client service rather than system maintenance."

Ultimately, the choice between building and buying technology solutions should be motivated by a clear understanding of the unique challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in retirement plan administration.

About

Benefits Tech Report

A modern journal covering retirement technology, plan consultant operations, fintech, and innovations shaping the retirement benefits industry.

Interested in sharing your thoughts or publishing your story here?

Featured Posts

Related Post

Aug 10, 2025

/

Post by

Retirement plan administrators face unique CRM challenges that generic platforms often can’t solve. This review compares leading options—PensionPro, Salesforce, HubSpot, and Stax.ai CX—and finds that Stax.ai’s purpose-built system stands out for its automation, sponsor portal, and census integration, making it a top choice for TPAs in 2025.

Aug 6, 2025

/

Post by

This article delves into the capabilities, enhancements, and competitive landscape surrounding Relius Technologies and its retirement plan solutions.

Jul 30, 2025

/

Post by

Stax.ai revolutionizes payroll processing for TPAs with seamless integrations, real-time data access, and a significant reduction in manual entry.

Jun 27, 2025

/

Post by

Explore strategies for optimizing year-end processing in ftwilliam.com to ensure compliance and reduce errors effectively.

Jun 1, 2025

/

Post by

Explore how Stax.ai's innovative platform elevates the client experience for Third-Party Administrators, streamlining operations and enhancing satisfaction.

May 13, 2025

/

Post by

Discover how Stax.ai innovates UX in retirement portals for sponsors and participants, emphasizing effective communication and engagement.

Aug 10, 2025

/

Post by

Retirement plan administrators face unique CRM challenges that generic platforms often can’t solve. This review compares leading options—PensionPro, Salesforce, HubSpot, and Stax.ai CX—and finds that Stax.ai’s purpose-built system stands out for its automation, sponsor portal, and census integration, making it a top choice for TPAs in 2025.

Aug 6, 2025

/

Post by

This article delves into the capabilities, enhancements, and competitive landscape surrounding Relius Technologies and its retirement plan solutions.

Jul 30, 2025

/

Post by

Stax.ai revolutionizes payroll processing for TPAs with seamless integrations, real-time data access, and a significant reduction in manual entry.

Jun 27, 2025

/

Post by

Explore strategies for optimizing year-end processing in ftwilliam.com to ensure compliance and reduce errors effectively.

Aug 10, 2025

/

Post by

Retirement plan administrators face unique CRM challenges that generic platforms often can’t solve. This review compares leading options—PensionPro, Salesforce, HubSpot, and Stax.ai CX—and finds that Stax.ai’s purpose-built system stands out for its automation, sponsor portal, and census integration, making it a top choice for TPAs in 2025.

Aug 6, 2025

/

Post by

This article delves into the capabilities, enhancements, and competitive landscape surrounding Relius Technologies and its retirement plan solutions.

Jul 30, 2025

/

Post by

Stax.ai revolutionizes payroll processing for TPAs with seamless integrations, real-time data access, and a significant reduction in manual entry.

Jun 27, 2025

/

Post by

Explore strategies for optimizing year-end processing in ftwilliam.com to ensure compliance and reduce errors effectively.

Subscribe now to stay updated with top news!

Subscribe now to stay updated with all the top news, exclusive insights, and weekly highlights you won’t want to miss.

Want to advertise? Request details and opportunities.

Subscribe now to stay updated with top news!

Subscribe now to stay updated with all the top news, exclusive insights, and weekly highlights you won’t want to miss.

Want to advertise? Request details and opportunities.

Subscribe now to stay updated with top news!

Subscribe now to stay updated with all the top news, exclusive insights, and weekly highlights you won’t want to miss.

Want to advertise? Request details and opportunities.